JACHIN AND BOAZ (Heb. יָכִין בֹּעַז), two pillars which were set up in front of the Sanctuary in Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem (I Kings 7:15–22, 41–42; II Kings 25:13, 17; Jer. 52:17, 20ff.; II Chron. 3:15–17; 4:12–13). The form and nature of these pillars are uncertain, and many proposals have been advanced by scholars. -Description There is a detailed description of the pillars in II Kings 7:15–22, 41–42 and II Chronicles 3:15–17; 4:12–13. The pillars were composed of two major parts: the stem, 18 cubits (c. 30 ft.) in height, five cubits (c. 8 ft.) in circumference, and one cubit in diameter; and the capital of the pillar, five cubits in height. The size of the capital was apparently altered in one of the renovations of the Temple, undertaken after the time of Solomon. Thus, in II Kings 25 the height is given as only three cubits. During the renovation all the pillars were apparently recast, which probably explains the contradiction between the description of the construction of the pillars in Kings and that in Jeremiah. According to the former, the pillars and their capitals were cast from solid copper (I Kings 7:16, 46), while according to the latter, they were hollow (Jer. 52:21). It is more difficult to discover the nature of the capitals, as the description of their construction is filled with unclear technical terms which do not appear elsewhere (cf. Kings 7:17–20, 41–42; Jer. 52:22–23). Without going into detail, it can be said that the capitals were decorated with three varieties of ornamentation – shushan ("lilywork"), sevakhah ("mesh-work") and rimmonim ("pomegranates"), crowned by an additional architectural design called gullah (גֻּלָּה). The last item is usually interpreted as a round bowl (on the basis of the parallel Akk. gullatu and the description of the Temple lamp in Zech. 4:2–3). The meaning of the other three terms is doubtful, and scholars usually resort to archaeological parallels for reconstructing them. Rabbinic scholars and medieval Jewish exegetes held that the capital here is a double one (cf. I Kings 7:20). Indeed, double capitals are known from clay molds of cultic structures from Palestine and Cyprus dating to the period under consideration, i.e., the Iron Age. In these molds, as in the biblical descriptions, there is a capital of lily leaves, in the center of which is a semispherical bowl. Even more similar examples are found in ivory inlays from Palestine and Mesopotamia dating from the eighth to the sixth centuries B.C.E., which contain an additional element of a series of elongated mauve objects shaped like pomegranates hanging below a capital decorated with lilywork. Some later scholars identified this capital with the square proto-Aeolian capitals (Yadin) characteristic of the architecture of the time of Solomon, which have been discovered in various locations in Palestine (in the royal palaces in Samaria, in the fortress of Ahab in Hazor, in the governor's house in Megiddo, Ramat Rahel, Gezer, etc.). Others attempted to reconstruct the appearance of the capitals by comparison with incense stands discovered in Megiddo, Taanach, and Gezer (Smith and, following him, Albright). The closest example is that from Megiddo, which like the biblical model contains three architectural designs – a bowl, rosette work (buds of flowers and lotuses), and pomegranates. In light of recent archaeological findings it has been suggested that sevakhah (I Kings 7:17) should be explained as apertures in the bowl, like those found in incense stands (cf. II Kings 1:2, where sevakhah refers to the "window bars"). This interpretation, however, is far from the literal meaning, and what is described here is a woven net which surrounded the capitals. -Function and Significance According to the Masoretic Version (I Kings 7:21 and II Chronicles 3:17), it appears that the pillars stood in front of the Sanctuary, inside the entrance hall. Their size, however, gives rise to doubts concerning their structural function. Thus, few scholars maintain that the pillars fulfilled any function in supporting the roof of the portico (as in temples of the Canaanite and Israelite period in Arad, Megiddo, and Tell Teinat). Most scholars tend to the opinion that these were two freestanding pillars, one on each side of the entrance, like those found in the archaeological artistic tradition of the Ancient East and in references in classical literature (Yeivin, Mazar, Albright, Smith, Roth, Watzinger, Berns, Galling, Gressmann, etc.). Thus, in the three molds from the Iron Age mentioned above, the common element is the freestanding pillars in front of the entrance. A similar phenomenon was found in three temples from the eighth century in Khorsabad in Assyria. Graphic representations of pillars standing outside the structure of a temple have been found on coins from the first century C.E. in Cyprus, Sardis, Pergamum, and Sidon. Finally, there are literary references to this type of pillar in descriptions of the temples of Herakles (Herodotus, 2:44), of the Tyrian Baal (Menader, quoted in Jos., Ant. 8:145), and of the Syrian goddess Atratah (Lucian, De Syria Dea, 16–27); one or two such pillars were constructed in honor of Herakles in the Tyrian settlement of Gadez (modern Cadiz) in Spain (Strabo, 3:170). Even those scholars who agreed that these pillars played no structural role in the Temple were divided in their opinions regarding their function. One suggestion was that they had a mythological significance, as "trees of life," or cosmic pillars; or perhaps they fulfilled a ritual function as cressets or incense lamps, like those found in a drawing of a tomb in Mareshah (Smith, Albright). Another possibility is that they had only symbolic significance, symbolizing the dwelling place of God in the Temple, like the monuments found in the temple in Shechem and the temple of Mekal in Beth-Shean (Yeivin); or perhaps they were imitations of Egyptian obelisks (Hollis). -Names The Septuagint in one passage (I Kings 7:21 (7) reads the Masoretic Boaz as Baaz (also Boas), and in another (II Chron. 3:17), as an adverbial phrase, Iσχύς (be-oz, "with strength"). The Vulgate reads it as Booz. Opinion was divided regarding the names as well. Those who maintained (Sayce, Cook, Cheyne) that what was described here is an imitation of a foreign custom maintained that the Hebrew names were a translation of the names of Babylonian or Phoenician gods. In contrast, some scholars maintained that these were predicates of the God of Israel (Klousterman). Some scholars held that these names were derived from a longer text (Sellin, Gressman). Especially well known is the suggestion by Scott that these are the first words of a literary work, similar to the biblical dynastic prophecies and royal hymns, which was engraved on the pillars. More acceptable is the opinion that the names Jachin and Boaz are proper names, like those found in other places in the Bible, representing the names of the builders or contributors (Gesenius, Ewald); or perhaps they were actually names of members of the royal household, as S. Yeivin maintains (cf. Num. 26:12; Ruth 2:1; I Chron. 24:17). Thus the pillars play a double role: they emphasize, on the one hand, the personal relationship between the Temple and the royal family and, on the other, the presence of God within the Temple. -BIBLIOGRAPHY: R.B.Y. Scott in: JBL, 58 (1939), 143–9; W.F. Albright, in: BASOR, 85 (1942), 18ff.; H.G. May, ibid., 88 (1945), 19ff.; Albright, Arch Rel, 144–8; J.L. Myres, in: PEQ, 80 (1948), 22ff.; P.L. Garber, in: BA, 14 (1951), 8–10; Y. Yadin, in: Avi-Yonah (ed.), Sefer Yerushalayim (1956), 185; S. Yeivin, in: Eretz-Israel, 5 (1959), 97–104. (Nili Shupak)

Encyclopedia Judaica. 1971.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Jachin and Boaz —    The names of two brazen columns set up in Solomon s temple (1 Kings 7:15 22). Each was eighteen cubits high and twelve in circumference (Jer. 52:21, 23; 1 Kings 7:17 21). They had doubtless a symbolical import …   Easton's Bible Dictionary

  • Jachin — A bronze pillar on the right (the south side) of the porch of Solomon s Temple (1 Kgs. 7:15–22), hollow and free standing, about 8 m. (26 feet) high and 5 m. (17 feet) in circumference, surmounted by a bowl shaped capital decorated with… …   Dictionary of the Bible

  • Boaz — Un tableau de Rembrandt représentant Boas et Ruth. Boaz, de l hébreu בועז bô az « en lui (est) la force », est un personnage du Livre de Ruth. Historique Riche propriétaire terrien de Bethléem, il est fils de Salmôn et Rahab …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Boaz and Jachin — Boaz and Jachin, two pillars, stood in the porch of Solomon s Temple, the first Temple in Jerusalem (1 Kings 7:21; 2 Kings 11:14; 23:3). DescriptionBoaz ( fleetness, strength ) stood on the left and Jachin ( founding ), also spelled Jakin (יָכִין …   Wikipedia

  • Jachin — may refer to: *Jachin, a son of Simeon according to , , and , one of the 70 souls to migrate to Egypt with Jacob. *Jachin, the first high priest of King Solomon s Temple. *The pillar in front of Solomon s Temple named after Jachin. See Boaz and… …   Wikipedia

  • Jachin und Boas — waren die Namen, die den beiden Säulen am Tor zum Eingang vom Tempel in Jerusalem gegeben wurden. König Salomo hatte sie nach biblischer Überlieferung von Hiram Abif, dem aus Tyros stammenden Architekten des Tempels, anfertigen lassen.… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Boaz (disambiguation) — Boaz may refer to:*Boaz, a biblical figure in the Book of Ruth *Boaz and Jachin, a pair of pillars in Solomon s Temple *Boaz, Alabama *Boaz, West Virginia *Bo az Ma uda, an Israeli singer *David Boaz, a libertarian and member of the Cato… …   Wikipedia

  • SIGNS AND SYMBOLS — A sign, in biblical Hebrew ʾot, is a mark, an object, or an event conveying some particular meaning. A sign is called mofet ( portent ) when it is portentous or   marvelous in character. Symbols constitute a special category of signs. They are… …   Encyclopedia of Judaism

  • BOAZ and JACHIN —    two pillars of brass at the entrance of Solomon s Temple, signifying respectively strength and stability …   The Nuttall Encyclopaedia

  • Boaz —    Alacrity.    1) The husband of Ruth, a wealthy Bethlehemite. By the levirate law the duty devolved on him of marrying Ruth the Moabitess (Ruth 4:1 13). He was a kinsman of Mahlon, her first husband.    2) The name given (for what reason is… …   Easton's Bible Dictionary

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”